Skip to content

GitLab

  • Menu
Projects Groups Snippets
    • Loading...
  • Help
    • Help
    • Support
    • Community forum
    • Submit feedback
    • Contribute to GitLab
  • Sign in
  • L lalcoradiari
  • Project information
    • Project information
    • Activity
    • Labels
    • Members
  • Repository
    • Repository
    • Files
    • Commits
    • Branches
    • Tags
    • Contributors
    • Graph
    • Compare
  • Issues 20
    • Issues 20
    • List
    • Boards
    • Service Desk
    • Milestones
  • Merge requests 0
    • Merge requests 0
  • CI/CD
    • CI/CD
    • Pipelines
    • Jobs
    • Schedules
  • Deployments
    • Deployments
    • Environments
    • Releases
  • Monitor
    • Monitor
    • Incidents
  • Packages & Registries
    • Packages & Registries
    • Package Registry
    • Infrastructure Registry
  • Analytics
    • Analytics
    • CI/CD
    • Repository
    • Value stream
  • Wiki
    • Wiki
  • Snippets
    • Snippets
  • Activity
  • Graph
  • Create a new issue
  • Jobs
  • Commits
  • Issue Boards
Collapse sidebar
  • Brian Brownlee
  • lalcoradiari
  • Issues
  • #20

Closed
Open
Created Feb 05, 2025 by Brian Brownlee@brianbrownlee5Maintainer

How an AI-written Book Shows why the Tech 'Horrifies' Creatives


For Christmas I got an intriguing gift from a buddy - my really own "very popular" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (excellent title) bears my name and my picture on its cover, and it has glowing reviews.

Yet it was completely composed by AI, with a couple of basic prompts about me supplied by my friend Janet.

It's an interesting read, and really funny in parts. But it likewise meanders rather a lot, and is somewhere in between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It imitates my chatty design of writing, but it's likewise a bit repetitive, and really verbose. It might have gone beyond Janet's triggers in collecting data about me.

Several sentences start "as a leading technology reporter ..." - cringe - which could have been scraped from an online bio.

There's also a mystical, repeated hallucination in the form of my cat (I have no pets). And there's a metaphor on practically every page - some more random than others.

There are lots of companies online offering AI-book writing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I got in touch with the chief executive Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, wiki.dulovic.tech he told me he had actually offered around 150,000 personalised books, generally in the US, given that rotating from putting together AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller costs ₤ 26. The company uses its own AI tools to create them, based on an open source large language design.

I'm not asking you to buy my book. Actually you can't - just Janet, who created it, can order any more copies.

There is currently no barrier to anyone producing one in any person's name, consisting of stars - although Mr Mashiach says there are guardrails around abusive material. Each book contains a printed disclaimer stating that it is imaginary, produced by AI, and developed "solely to bring humour and joy".

Legally, the copyright belongs to the firm, however Mr Mashiach stresses that the item is planned as a "personalised gag present", and the books do not get offered even more.

He intends to expand his range, creating different genres such as sci-fi, and maybe using an autobiography service. It's created to be a light-hearted form of consumer AI - offering AI-generated products to human customers.

It's likewise a bit scary if, like me, you write for a living. Not least since it most likely took less than a minute to produce, and kenpoguy.com it does, certainly in some parts, sound much like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and actors worldwide have actually revealed alarm about their work being used to train generative AI tools that then churn out similar material based upon it.

"We need to be clear, when we are speaking about information here, we actually suggest human developers' life works," states Ed Newton Rex, accc.rcec.sinica.edu.tw founder of Fairly Trained, which campaigns for AI companies to regard developers' rights.

"This is books, this is articles, this is pictures. It's masterpieces. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to learn how to do something and after that do more like that."

In 2023 a tune including AI-generated voices of Canadian vocalists Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social media before being pulled from streaming platforms since it was not their work and they had actually not granted it. It didn't stop the track's developer trying to nominate it for a Grammy award. And despite the fact that the artists were phony, it was still hugely popular.

"I do not believe the usage of generative AI for innovative purposes should be banned, but I do believe that generative AI for these purposes that is trained on individuals's work without authorization must be banned," Mr Newton Rex adds. "AI can be very effective but let's develop it ethically and fairly."

OpenAI states Chinese competitors using its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes industry and dents America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - consisting of the BBC - have actually selected to obstruct AI developers from trawling their online material for training purposes. Others have chosen to collaborate - the Financial Times has actually partnered with ChatGPT creator OpenAI for example.

The UK federal government is thinking about an overhaul of the law that would enable AI designers to use developers' material on the internet to assist develop their models, unless the rights holders opt out.

Ed Newton Rex explains this as "insanity".

He explains that AI can make advances in locations like defence, healthcare and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.

"All of these things work without going and altering copyright law and messing up the livelihoods of the nation's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, annunciogratis.net a crossbench peer in the House of Lords, is likewise highly against eliminating copyright law for AI.

"Creative industries are wealth developers, 2.4 million jobs and a lot of pleasure," says the Baroness, who is also an advisor to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The federal government is undermining one of its best carrying out markets on the vague guarantee of growth."

A government representative stated: "No relocation will be made up until we are absolutely positive we have a practical strategy that provides each of our goals: increased control for right holders to assist them license their material, access to top quality material to train leading AI designs in the UK, and more openness for best holders from AI developers."

Under the UK federal government's brand-new AI strategy, a national information library containing public data from a wide variety of sources will also be made offered to AI scientists.

In the US the future of federal guidelines to control AI is now up in the air following President Trump's return to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that aimed to boost the safety of AI with, amongst other things, firms in the sector required to share details of the operations of their systems with the US federal government before they are .

But this has actually now been rescinded by Trump. It remains to be seen what Trump will do instead, however he is stated to desire the AI sector to face less policy.

This comes as a variety of lawsuits versus AI companies, and particularly against OpenAI, continue in the US. They have been taken out by everybody from the New York Times to authors, music labels, and even a comic.

They claim that the AI companies broke the law when they took their material from the internet without their authorization, and utilized it to train their systems.

The AI business argue that their actions fall under "reasonable use" and are for that reason exempt. There are a number of elements which can constitute fair usage - it's not a straight-forward definition. But the AI sector is under increasing scrutiny over how it gathers training data and whether it should be spending for it.

If this wasn't all adequate to contemplate, Chinese AI company DeepSeek has shaken the sector over the previous week. It ended up being one of the most downloaded free app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek claims that it developed its technology for a portion of the cost of the similarity OpenAI. Its success has actually raised security concerns in the US, and threatens American's present dominance of the sector.

When it comes to me and a profession as an author, I believe that at the moment, if I truly want a "bestseller" I'll still have to compose it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the present weak point in generative AI tools for bigger jobs. It has plenty of inaccuracies and hallucinations, and it can be quite difficult to check out in parts since it's so verbose.

But given how quickly the tech is evolving, I'm not sure how long I can stay confident that my considerably slower human writing and modifying abilities, are better.

Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the biggest advancements in global innovation, with analysis from BBC correspondents around the world.

Outside the UK? Register here.

Assignee
Assign to
Time tracking